Highlight any text and click to have it read aloud
Kingspark School in Dundee opened in 2009 but very quickly concerns emerged. By 2013, there were 20% more pupils in the school that had been planned. By 2014, it was nearly 140% more – 175 instead of 125.
In 2010 a new electronic recording system encouraged school staff to see themselves as the victims of attacks by school pupils even where there was no malicious intent such as a child having an epileptic fit whose involuntary hand movements touched a member of staff.
Meanwhile allegations were being made that a small but significant number of children were being illegally restrained or subject to physical abuse.
One 12 year old child was restrained on the ground by four teaching and support staff. Bruising and blood spots on his chest indicated that he had been held face down in what is an illegal hold. The incident was repeated on two subsequent days. His mother said “Four teachers held my small epileptic child on the floor till he passed our and urinated. Then they let him go!”
Earlier this week LDAS published an report from a Whistleblower that said there was a developing of a new approach in the assessment of current applications for the Personal Independence Payment. This centred around instructions being given to ATOS Health Professionals about how they should carry out face to face interviews.
LDAS is an independent campaigning organisation that believes information should lead to action. Our intention in publishing this article was to inform people so that they could help change the approach of ATOS to this. It is always better to stop things before they become entrenched.
A number of people have been in contact to say they have felt scared as a result of the information and blamed LDAS for making it available. As a result of this, we have taken the original down.
We did speak to the author and felt that they were genuine in promoting this article. They are a well respected disability activist known to two leading disabled person's organisations.
A number of things about the context for the article are important to think about. The government's flagship problem of welfare reform is in a difficult place. With a general election only a year away, Universal Credit has stalled and PIP is drowning in a huge backlog of claims that cannot be processed because of the length of time assessments are taking. In this it strikes us that it is reasonable to suppose ATOS management to be looking at ways they can speed up assessments of the backlog. It is in this context that we think there was merit in this article.
We will be making no further comment on this matter.
We really pleased to be able to announce copies of two new Easy Read documents on the arguments for and against Independence. These will help people with learning disabilities make up their mind about what they would like to do in the referendum on September 18th.
The first is from the Better Together campaign and summarises the reasons why Scotland should stick together with the rest of the UK.
The second is from the Scottish Government and summarises the White Paper on Scotland.
Council failed to consult properly over day centre closure by not asking specific about particular services due to close. It was not enough to imply that a new policy might mean some closures says the Court of Appeal
A county council failed to consult properly about the closure of a day centre, the Court of Appeal has ruled. The case of LH, R (on the application of) v Shropshire Council  EWCA Civ 404 centred on the closure of the Hartleys Day Centre in Shrewsbury. The claimant (LH) was a 63-year-old user of the centre who had a learning disability and had been assessed as having substantial care needs. Her sister acted as her litigation friend.
Shropshire had decided to close Hartleys after re-thinking the approach to day care in the county. This reconfiguration was partly a result of budgetary constraints and partly followed Government encouragement to give disabled people personalised budgets for spending in relation to their disability.
At issue was the extent of consultation required when a council reconfigures its day services and then decides to close a centre.
- The local authority argued that it had consulted generally about the new system it was bringing in and had made it clear that some day care centres would close.
- The claimant, however, argued that she and others should have been consulted in relation to the closure of Hartleys itself before it occurred. It was also alleged that there had been a failure to comply with the public sector equality duty contained in s. 149 of the Equality Act 2010.
Nicola Sturgeon told the SNP spring conference in Aberdeen on Saturday that the Scottish Government would set up new fund to help disabled people, to take the place of the Independent Living Fund, which she said was being closed by the UK Government.
The Scottish Independent Living Fund will support more than 3,000 disabled people, and a £5.5 million investment will mean it will be open to new claimants, as well as those who benefit from the existing scheme. The new fund will be managed by the third sector.
The UK Government's support scheme has been closed to new applicants since 2010 and is due to close altogether in June 2015.
The Scottish Government's version of the fund will come into effect in July that year, subject to the full allocation of funding being devolved.
We will be interested in clarification on how people can be referred to the new fund. The official press release says that referral will be by local authority social worker. Given that people may need to have a qualifying level of existing services before they can apply then this may not be a problem but there is a worry that giving the keys to yet another gate to local authorities may lead to consequences that no one expects.